Tips, questions, and suggestions
Sign up for emails
ViewPoint:Opinions
Smackdown
Holbrooke Slams Bush Refugee Policy
Compares Abandonment of Iraqis to Holocaust-Era Refusal to Assist Jews
05/04/2007 12:09 PM ET
Baghdad, IRAQ: Iraqi displaced children play outside a camp for displaced people in Baghdad's al-Karrada neighbourhood, 25 March 2007.
Ahmad al-Rubaye/AFP/Getty
Baghdad, IRAQ: Iraqi displaced children play outside a camp for displaced people in Baghdad's al-Karrada neighbourhood, 25 March 2007.

In an assessment certain to make Bush Administration officials squirm, Ambassador Richard Holbrooke has used the occasion of an introduction to a book, Diplomat Heroes of the Holocaust, to compare the treatment of Iraqi refugees in recent years to the despicable era of humanitarian insensitivities during the rise of Hitler, when many governments blocked Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi persecution. Holbrooke begins his piece:

"Imagine that you are a consular officer in the middle of a diplomatic career that you hope will lead to an ambassadorship. There are two rubber stamps on your desk. Using the one that says "APPROVED" would allow the desperate person sitting in front of you to travel to your country legally. Using the other stamp, which says "REJECTED," could mean consigning that person to prison or even death."

Holbrooke relates the stories of Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg in Budapest, Aristides de Sousa Mendes, the Portuguese consul general in Bordeaux, and Hiram Bingham IV, an American State Department official, who each paid a high price--Wallenberg with his life--for rebelling against the prevailing powers of their own governments to save the lives of Jewish refugees.

The situations brave men such as Wallenberg, Sousa Mendes, and Bingham faced are not just ancient history. They are similar to what is happening now in Iraq. Since the 2003 invasion, the U.S. government has allowed only 466 Iraqi refugees to enter the United States, even though more than two million have fled the country (mostly to Jordan and Syria). Among those desperately seeking safety are thousands of Iraqis who worked with or supported U.S. personnel in Iraq. They are at the greatest possible risk. In an embarrassing interview recently, Ellen Sauerbrey, assistant secretary of state for population, refugees, and migration, told 60 Minutes that the small number and slow processing is the result of new, post-9/11 security requirements. Even Iraqis who were given security clearances to work with U.S. troops in sensitive positions in Iraq have to wait several years to get approved. Sauerbrey boasted about increasing this year's Iraqi refugee quota to 7,000 -- still a pathetically small number given U.S. responsibility for the desperate plight of fleeing Iraqis. Under similar circumstances, between 1975 and 1980, Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter took in over 500,000 refugees from Vietnam and Cambodia. Those refugees were initially put into camps of "first asylum" for security screening before being permitted to settle in the United States, where today they are a vibrant part of American life.

In fact, if it were not for Senator Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), who has made refugees a prime concern for over 40 years, the Bush administration would probably still be ignoring the issue; President George W. Bush has yet to mention it in public. That the sorry story of the 1930s is being repeated -- with so little public outrage -- is more than disturbing; it is shameful. Why is the White House doing so little? And where are the Binghams and Sousa Mendeses of 2007?

Every age will present people in positions of authority with similar difficult dilemmas. The details will vary, but the challenge will be the same. If you were in such a situation, would you realize it? And if you did, what would you do?

SloggerHeadlines






































































Wounded Warrior Project