Tips, questions, and suggestions
Sign up for emails
StatCrunch:Studies
Archive: April 2009
See it here
'Institute for the Study of War' Graph Compares Violence Levels Over Three Years
04/30/2009 11:27 AM ET

This new ISW graph by the Institute for the Study of War, submitted by ISW president Kimberly Kagen, compares violence levels in Iraq and Afghanistan over a three year period (measuring frequency of four different classifications of attacks) between December 2006 and February 2009.

Download hi-res version here.

The brief accompanying text is below.
ISW: Afghanistan Attacks in Iraq Perspective
April 24, 2009

Recently, news stories out of Afghanistan have focused heavily on the increase in violence there. As the U.S. sends more troops into the country to improve the security situation, the upward trend of violence is certainly concerning. However, it is helpful to put the violence into perspective. A new ISW Graph shows how violence levels in Afghanistan compare to violence levels in Iraq. The ISW Graph provides a startling sense of what is happening on the ground in Afghanistan.

read it here
NEJM Study Shows Execution-Style Killings Main Cause of Death of Non-Combatants
04/19/2009 12:37 PM ET

A New England Journal of Medicine study,
just out, entitled The Weapons That Kill Civilians — Deaths of Children and Noncombatants in Iraq, 2003–2008, claims that evidence indicates that execution-style killings have been the highest killer of non-combatants, not military operations or suicide bombings.

The journal based their findings on figures from Iraq Body Count, the internet database which seeks to compile accurate numbers of civilian deaths in Iraq.

From the report...

Armed violence, such as that in the ongoing conflict in Iraq, is a threat to global health.1 It causes serious injuries and deaths of civilians, makes orphans of children, traumatizes populations, and undermines the ability of communities to provide adequate medical care even as it dramatically increases health care needs. Moreover, indiscriminate or intentional harm to civilians violates humanitarian principles and basic human rights. Believing that a careful assessment of the effects of different kinds of weapons on civilians in Iraq was needed, we used the database of the Iraq Body Count (IBC), a nongovernmental organization that documents civilian violent deaths in Iraq,2 to determine the nature and effects of various weapons on civilians in Iraq. The patterns we found convince us that documenting the particular causes of violent civilian deaths during armed conflict is essential, both to prevent civilian harm and to monitor compliance with international humanitarian law.

Download the entire 4-page study. NEJM_4_16_09.pdf


SloggerHeadlines






































































Wounded Warrior Project